In the West, even the poor generally receive enough assistance to eat the minimum necessary calories to avoid malnutrition and sleep somewhere sheltered from the elements.
Their poverty status is in relation to other in their society who are wealthy enough to own property and enjoy some of the privileges of relative affluence. However, the type of poverty experienced by more than one billion human beings elsewhere on earth qualifies as absolute, by virtue of their lack of the most basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter. Singer proposes an analogous characterization of absolute affluence to describe the living conditions of the average person living in more developed societies.
According to Singer, the living conditions of even the decidedly non-wealthy in the United States represents unimaginable wealth and luxury to the poor in Third-World nations. Singer suggests that those of us fortunate enough to live in absolute affluence in societies where even the poor enjoy general good nutrition, health, and relative longevity owe an affirmative moral duty to provide more assistance to those enduring lives of absolute poverty in other parts of the world.
He uses the analogy of the moral obligation to rescue a drowning child at little comparative cost to the rescuer and suggests that the same principle applies to addressing global poverty. Specifically, the argument is that a moral duty to intervene to save a stranger exists anytime the act of rescue can be accomplished without substantial cost to the rescuer. Singer applies that reasoning to the situation of global absolute poverty and outlines the four-step logical basis for the moral duty to intervene on the part of the absolutely affluent.
First, one should be willing to make nominal sacrifices to prevent great harm to others; second, absolute poverty qualifies as "great harm"; and third, absolute poverty is preventable or rectifiable, at least to some degree, by our action. Therefore, we should do something to address absolute poverty. Moreover, the value of aid that poor nations receive is much higher than its cost for rich nations.
Developed world uses their wealth in luxury and non-basic amenities which are not necessities. Alternatively, if the same wealth is expended for providing food and education in developing nations, it will be worthier. For example, countries like USA can cut some spending on entertainment and deploy it for providing food and education in some countries in Africa. In conclusion, wealthy nations should consider themselves as care takers and provide maximum support for basic necessities such as food and education in developing countries.
Band 8 Essay Samples. Band 8 essay Should wealthy nations help poor nations? A further reason why many countries help poorer ones is for economic reasons. The donors may want to control the supply of commodities such as oil, water, or wheat. Alternatively, the richer country may want to ensure markets for their own products, whether these are planes, computers or shoes.
However, aid is not necessarily the best way to help a country. For one thing, billions of dollars of aid often goes missing, into corrupt governments or inefficient administration.
A second point is that many foreign aid projects are unsuitable for the target country. Many agencies build huge dams or industrial projects that fail after a few years or that do not involve the local people. Furthermore, much aid returns to the donor. This can be in the form of expensive specialized equipment and experts from the donor country. There are many other ways we can help poor countries. Opening up trade barriers, so that poor countries can sell their goods is one way.
Another is to remove subsidies so that imported goods from poorer countries can compete fairly. A third method is to forgive debts. Many poor countries have huge interest repayments on old loans. The needs of the poorer countries may seem obvious.
GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR NATIONS DUE TO GLOBALIZATION INTERNATIONAL INEQUALITY Inequality must be defined and be able to be measured so that comparisons can be made between rich and poor countries. Once the causes are determined, the effects of globalization can be evaluated and be measured.
PTE 8 Band Essay Writing- Should wealthy nations help poor nations? In our closely linked world, trade has increased between countries. This trade is usually between rich countries but there are many poor countries which do not have access to education, health, and trade. Their governments lack financial means to improve their living.
Peter Singer’s argument focuses greatly on the nation that citizens of rich nations can with ease help poor nations, without causing any financial burden, therefore, helping those in need should be done. In conclusion, wealthy nations should consider themselves as care takers and provide maximum support for basic necessities such as food and education in developing countries. Related posts: IELTS essay about financial assistance to poor nations.
This essay will look at the arguments for and against helping poor countries. There are many reasons for helping poor countries. First of all, there are humanitarian reasons. Essay topic. Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.